Gade's performance

Gade and Bao first met in AE 2003, few months after Peter returned from a 1 year long injury. That year he lost twice to BCL. Its important to remember that both players were not as good in 2003 as they are now, BCL are much more consisten these days and Gade has regained his form after being injured in 2001. If you look in history books youll notice that Gade actually won Malaysia Open in 1998 and now in 2007 thats 9 years between the two titles:eek:
 
Really no reason to even think about the "match fixing" of Danish player until one of them allow "walk" citing injury. Kenneth may not have won many big titles but he's certainly a professional player with high dignity that I come to respect!


virusvoodoo said:
Actually I think Peter Gade and Kenneth Jonassen usually meet in the final round of the Copanhagen Masters and European Masters. The only other tournaments where they met each other were the final of the 2005 Korean Open and 2006 Philippines Open.

Copanhagen Masters do not account for points as it is only an invitational to a friendly tournament so I don't understand why it would make any sense for the Danes to "fix" their own invitational tournament. As for the other tournaments, they rarely ever met in the earlier rounds, mostly in the final in which it doesn't make sense for them to "fix" matches either. Denmark and other countries are not like China which is the only country that has enough great men's singles players that it is possible to run into their own countrymen in the earlier rounds.

I have to agree with Morten here that it wasn't match fixing that Peter Gade always beat Kenneth Jonassen but instead it was his skills and game play that was one step higher than Jonassen's. Look at the Korean's retired pairs, KDM/HTK and LDS/YYS, the latter pair never prevail against their compatriots but they always played their best. Their effort were greatly demonstrated in the 2004 Athens Olympics final and 1999 World Championships final or maybe it was during an All England final.
 
Eurasian =--(O) said:
I think Peter Gade is going to win 08 Olympics and retire.

That's a bit too far ahead. Peter is probably just hoping to be in his top form and play at his peak during this year's World Championships. After that we start predicting about the '08 Bejing Olympics.

Anyway, like yourself I wish him the best of luck in the upcoming tournaments, especially the '07 WC and '08 Olympics as he is a very hard worker and tough fighter with a great attitude.
 
Last edited:
2cents said:
That's what I'm talking about!!!

Anything to do with his treatment? or performance enhancing process :confused: :confused: :confused:

whats so f-ing hard to understand about a hair-cut??? Which he did long before his illness btw...

/Twobeer
 
2cents said:
I meant to say "Gade must have found the way to enhance his performance during his treatment". There will be no doubt for Gade's win.

Personally I think given that both Bao and Gade playes to their best abilities Gade will win most of the time.. He is simply a better badminton player (my opinion of course).

Personally I think Chen Hong has the highest "peak"-level (for one game) of the Cineese players.. Lin Dan is super-fit and best allround.. Chen Jin is quick as lightning.. but Bao.. is well.. a bit "colorless"...

Sorry to offend all Bao fans out there.. Because he is truly one of the worlds greatest players.. but still.. I cant help to find his game a bit boring (relative to his peers)..

/Twobeer
 
bananaboy said:
I agree that Peter Gade has an excellent chance of winning this MO title, but it ain't as easy as you say it is.:cool:

Let me ask you this, whom are the "3 of the very best" are you referring to? Lin Dan, Taufik, and whom?? LCW, but didn't he lose to someone better named BCL? so another word, there is still someone better than the so-called 3 of the very best in the mix of the semi-final.

Plus, how can you call LCW one of the 3 very best consider his result last year, won a few 4* touranments, then having lost to numerous players throughout the year, plus early exits in 2 tournaments???:confused:

He is not wrong. '3 of the very best' implies in the 'very best' category, there are at least 3, maybe 5, maybe 8..., who, on any day, on neutral ground, can defeat one another, and display superior skills. You read it as '3 very best' which means 'the top 3' so the problem lies with your interpretation.Check with your English Language teacher.
 
Did anyone notice that as many times as BAO served high to the back, Peter would smash in return ?

Without a doubt, I think this is the way to play. It is sending a message to BAO that Peter would not tolerate disrespect. If Bao dares to serve high, he would dare to smash every ball. I like this coz I think it shows Peter has the confidence to smash every ball if he wants to.
 
Peter’s mental strength amazes Danish coach


DANISH coach Thomas Stuer-Lauridsen is in awe over Peter Gade-Christensen's sensational Malaysian Open victory.

“Peter showed that he was mentally very strong for the competition despite the tough circumstances that he had to overcome. That is the special thing about him,” said Stuer-Lauridesen.

In fact, Stuer Lauridsen said that the outstanding win had brought back the confidence in Gade-Christensen, whose career almost came when he was bogged down by nagging knee injuries in 2000 and 2001.

“Peter now knows that he has a chance out there. He came close to having to sit out the tournament but now, he has achieved one of his best wins. And the crowd just loved his attacking game,” said Stuer-Lauridsen.

“His work ethics is excellent and he puts in so much effort in badminton. He also takes care of his body.
“Players like him makes the job of the coaches like me easier. I am very thrilled over his achievement today.”

Source: http://www.thestar.com.my/sports/
 
Malaysian fans love PG

2cents said:
Hi Morten and Virusvoodoo, It's not my intent to discuss who fixing the match. The only words I mentioned to reply Virusvoodoo original suggestion were that Malaysia and China players fight more aggressively with teammates. There is no proof to charge any body now fixing the match. But however, we can see tomorrow's two semi-finals, to see which one using more minutes and more rally points.

The original intent of this thread was to find out why Peter Gade suddenly becomes so strong during his severe illness. Thanks

The answer is simple. Malaysians love PG. First he was forced to give his body 2 days of complete rest.Also, maybe the Malaysian medical care was first class for him. But , most of all, the crowd was 200% behind him, unleashing the energy that is latent in him. On top of that, no one expected him to go far, so he has no negative stress toxins to deplete his strength and all his energy is converted positively. It's not how much total energy that counts but positive conversion level that matters.
As for PG vs KJ, I saw the SO06 MSF between them. KJ never had a chance. PG practically destroyed KJ with his attacking play, quick and straight. In MO07 SF, PG was playing to see if he can conserve energy by not attacking (which is very energy-consuming) in the second because he was confident of taking the third.
In the MSF, he dared not attack BCL all out in the second because if he could not close in two , he may lose the third. He play the second in such a way that he still has the energy for attacking play in the third. Tall players like BCL and KJ seem esp. vulnerable to attacking play.
 
I hope this Peter, Kenneth, and their coach Thomas Laudisen proved in this tournament that Denmark "match-fixing" is NOT TRUE to those who may believe that it was true. I mean Denmark should have been smart and give either Peter or Kenneth rest with a walkover but they ended up playing three hard-fought sets against each other for a spot in the final even when one of them was hospitalized a few days earlier.

As for China, we don't know for sure but I must agree that they do have give a lot of walkovers to their teammates but players/coaches *ahem LYB ahem* should learn a thing or two from Danish players/coaches especially when it comes to sportmanships.
 
virusvoodoo said:
Man, I'm so jealous; that one guy in the audience caught Peter's AT-700 after he tossed it into the crowd.

:D

I'm so jealous for anybody who was there at all! :p

Heia Peter Gade!
 
Last edited:
Morten said:
2cents i couldnt disagree more with you than about what you saying about the danes. Only country we have seen "fix" the matches were the chinese shuttlers some years ago. I stopped playing badminton, but in my former badminton club a former chinese national player Luo told me how China used to fix the matches, he once got told by a chinese coach to loose the semi finals in the junior WC semi final after beating Gade in the quarter cause he should meet Chen Gang who had to be fresh for the final.

Only reason why Gade wins against Jonassen is cause he is slight better and then the big factor the mental aspect. But several matches have been close and some 3 setters so that explains itself that no matches are fixed between them. However its nice to see that the chinese have putted the match fixing away and started to play as real sportsmen, thats what the sport need to promote itself.

And where are the fact now?:eek: :eek: :eek: Please support your statement:eek:
 
Given Taufik and Lin Dan both lost in the early rounds, Peter Gade emerged as the final winner. It's not lucky though. I must say that the young aces LCW, Bao C L, Chen Jin and LHY still have a lot to learn from Peter Gade. For LCW, once again he was devastated by his weak mentality and rendered the title to the Dane. If he had Gade's excellent mentality, I believe he would qualify as "3 of the very best".
 
Back
Top