*~Taufik~*
Regular Member
why dun haf WD???
this IS depressing for me,,,,,madturtle said:HOW COULD THEY HAVE LOST!:crying: :crying: :crying: this is so depressing!
:crying: :crying:aiyuuw said:this IS depressing for me,,,,,
well, that could be becos:
-the danes are just too great
-they werent at their best
-they felt burdened becos they were the only indo's hope
but, not to take anything away from je/mlh, all respects for them, i think it could have turned the other way , especially in the last 2 sets, becos those were so close
mirrura said::crying: :crying:
Indeed close!! I thought that the Indonesians would have won the title judging from their first set. They were just too good for the Danes. However, in the next two sets, Eriksen - Lundgaard Hansen were much better and they were a couple of exciting rallies!! Anyway, it's nice to see that Candra - Sigit playing together quite impressive
Mm...Candra - Sigit felt the burden?? I don't think so, they are an experience pair and this is only Korean Open, not the World Championship or any really BIG tourney![]()
China isn't strong in XD? The only pair that could consistently beat Zhang Jun and Gao Ling was Kim Dong-moon and Na(Ra) Kyung-min and they've retired.kwun said:3 events won by Korea.
2 events won by Denmark.
i think China should be worried. historically, the Sudirman Cup is determined by the results of the XD and/or MD. and China isn't very strong in either one.
kwun said:3 events won by Korea.
2 events won by Denmark.
i think China should be worried. historically, the Sudirman Cup is determined by the results of the XD and/or MD. and China isn't very strong in either one.
rwchen said:It is bound to be stiff competition among China, Denmark, Korea, Indonesia and Malaysia but China is still undeniably the strongest contender for Sudirman judging from its superiority in WS and WD besides having a balanced strength in MS, MD and XD.
jens/martin or rassmussen/paaske?hcyong said:Denmark is the only other team that can conceivably defeat China. Peter Gade and Jens/Martin could get 2 points, and Jens/Mette may rise to the occassion to defeat Zhang/Gao. But what are the odds of all 3 succeeding?
other said:jens/martin or rassmussen/paaske?
also didnt korea 1st WD win again the chinese 1st WD in the UC2004...
oh well, as long as the chinese team play without too much pressure on them, it should be ok*he says hopefully*
hcyong said:Candra/Sigit should have wrapped it all up in the second set. They were leading something like 13-6, but somehow they made errors after errors at that point. This reminds me of the match between Jens/Martin and Choong/Lee, where Lee Wan Wah just gave up after being penalised for not being ready to receive serve. In yesterday's match, Jens also served a few times when the opponent was not ready, and the serves were ordered retaken. There was a huge psychological battle going on, and I hope it is not becoming a staple of international badminton, because frankly, it can be ugly. Frankly speaking, I think the better pair lost yesterday.
...
Well.. when Jens is involved it is hardly surprising that the match turns into a psychological battle.. Mag has analyzed this thoroughly in other threads where it is also mentioned that Jens takes this battle very close to the line.. and some would argue sometimes over the line.. in any case.. there is no doubt that this psychological warfare is a part of modern badminton.. just as it is a part of other sports at a high level.. just remember at the Australian Open a couple of days ago when one of Leyton Hewitts opponents was so upset with Hewitt that he first tried to serve right at his body (the ball did not even touch the court but went behind the base-line).. and later on actually tried to spit at Hewit.. obviously.. things are out of control when they get that far.. and if we do not want it in badminton.. the umpires must do something about it.. otherwise.. I think it is here to stay.. because there is no doubt that a match like the MD final in Korea in Jens' mind is only a confirmation that it pays to play the psychological field as well..
Yes, Korea did take a WD win over China but that was with Na Kyung-min. She has since retired. Don't be fooled by her no. 5 ranking. She hasn't played internationally since the Olympics. That makes a huge difference. The Yi Kyung-won/Yi Hyo-jung partnership isn't bad but it's nothing like the former Yi/Na partnership. Nor is Yi Hyo-jung/Yi Jae-jin anywhere near the sure win that Kim/Na used to be. The big stumbling block for Korea in the Sudirman could be men's singles unless Son Seung-mo convalesces quickly after his operation and returns to form. Yi Hyun-il claimed that his month in the army put him off his game but let's face it: he hasn't been on his game for quite a while now. He had a rash of good showings in 2003 but he hasn't been in a semi-final since the Taipei Open 2003. Still, if all it takes is 3 doubles wins, Korea could take down China. Checking again, I find that Yi Hyo-jung has beaten at least 3 of the top Chinese pairs with both Yi Kyung-won and even with Hwang Yu-mi. In light of this, they are certainly a better bet for a women's doubles upset than Denmark or any other Sudirman contender.other said:jens/martin or rassmussen/paaske?
also didnt korea 1st WD win again the chinese 1st WD in the UC2004...
oh well, as long as the chinese team play without too much pressure on them, it should be ok*he says hopefully*
klaphat said:Well.. when Jens is involved it is hardly surprising that the match turns into a psychological battle.. Mag has analyzed this thoroughly in other threads where it is also mentioned that Jens takes this battle very close to the line.. and some would argue sometimes over the line.. in any case.. there is no doubt that this psychological warfare is a part of modern badminton.. just as it is a part of other sports at a high level.. just remember at the Australian Open a couple of days ago when one of Leyton Hewitts opponents was so upset with Hewitt that he first tried to serve right at his body (the ball did not even touch the court but went behind the base-line).. and later on actually tried to spit at Hewit.. obviously.. things are out of control when they get that far.. and if we do not want it in badminton.. the umpires must do something about it.. otherwise.. I think it is here to stay.. because there is no doubt that a match like the MD final in Korea in Jens' mind is only a confirmation that it pays to play the psychological field as well..