Nano Pro 9000, APACS doesn't have a Nano Speed 9000. They do have a Nano 9000 Speed though, which I have not tried.
Ei guys! I've been wanting to buy the Nano Power 900( White ). Aside from ordering it from apacscanada, where can I can it closer to my place. Thanks!
nano pro 9600 tour vs nano fusion 608 pro DinkAlot, you're probably the only one who's played with both these rackets. Would you say that these two rackets are almost identicle in terms of ease of maneouvering, but slight edge to 9600 for smashing power due to stiffer shaft? I came across conflicting info regarding the length of these rackets. Are they both extra long rackets? Which racket do u feel is more head light? I couldn't decide between these two rackets. Coming from a nanospeed 4500, i want to upgrade to a racket that's slightly stiffer and headlight to even balance that allows for easy, fast swinging motion. Just want to know which racket would fit my criteria more. Thanks in advance
The 9600 Tour and 608 Pro are completely different rackets. The 9600 Tour is like a Yonex NS9000-S, but even a bit lighter in weight as well as head light. It's an all-around defensive racket. The 608 Pro is a thick shaft, stiff attacking beast. Don't let the shape of the frame fool ya. I've said this before and I'll say it one more time, you cannot reliably use the APACS specs. They are, in general, off. Most of the APACS rackets I have tested did not have the correct BP, weight and grip size. "So, it just depends." What a corny line, but Panda will coin it. I'm in the process of modifying and updating all the APACs rackets I've tested. Some, like the L50, T200, NP9900, VH1800, 9600 Tour, Super Light and 608 Pro are among the best rackets I'ved tried in there respective catogories. Hope to have it up by the end of the week.
hi dink how come nanopro 9000 is nt included? is it not good? wad is the difference between nanopro 9000 and 9600 and compare with the stiffness with 1 more stiff?
^ i'm waiting i tried many apacs racket and still cant find one for me, looking your view to compare and decide....what about the string? I really impressed with New tech....Ti-spider is too slipery for me
Looking forward to the review. Just got a sponsorship with apacs and struggling to find a racket that suits my game.
Panda plays doubles and mixed so Panda used the Lethal 50. If singles, the Nano Pro 9900. For all-around, bias towards attacking: Lethal 50, swings like an 88g moderately end weight racket. Tantrum 200, similar to the L50 but swings 2-3g lighter Visible Hollow 1800, slightly different feel but a great performing racket, comparable swing weight to the L50. For all-around, bias towards defense: Nano Pro 9600 Tour For all out attacking and singles players: Nano Pro 9900, ultra stiff, solid feel, gram from gram extremely powerful Nano Fusion 608 Pro, solid all-around, thick, aero frame Visible Hollow 1500, a more flexible, forgiving racket, but still hits bombs.
The AMPs are great but I find them a bit brittle. For the average joe, I think the racket will do just fine but if you are a hard hitter, the racket may eventually break.
So out of all those rackets, the Nano Pro 9900 would be the best for attacking? How would you say the stiffness compares to some of Yonex's stiffest rackets that you have tested?
It's stiff like the Cab 22 but is forgiving yet still solid, stiffer than the 9000-X but again, more forgiving so you have better feel. It's like a SOTX Woven 11 but with good defense.
