You can never play with arm alone! All your defence will require your wrist. Your net play will need ur wrist.. etc.. so ideally a racket should be suitable for u with arm and wrists.. i.e suitable for pronation and supination ..
They can’t ditch the current line up!! That is they might change the name of aeronaut, 3D caliber and turbocharging but can’t ditch the instinct, combat and Drive I reckon. they can’t!! If they do then they are really up to something new in line with yonex and other brands.let just hope Lining didnt repeat the same mistake & releasing 10 racket on each model with total 30 different racket color with close to similar spec.
3 racket on each model would be sufficient, or 4 at most if you insist to had more option. 1 high end, 1 mid end, 1 low end. & ofcourse add some salt to it, we hate to eat plain taste tho its healthy for us. Give us some stupid word. Its stupid but it matter to us when we want to buy thing.
Which part if his sentence that you don't understand? He said "more arm than wrist", not "wrist alone"
Of course any brand has full range of products. What are you trying to say?
Always take it with a pinch of salt bro.. just don’t take the literal meanings. When we say u can never play with arm alone that doesn’t translate he always plays with arm!!
This is true technically. Though my main factor from switching to LN is due to shaft flexibility as we don't really get any younger, so better protect the joints as early as possible. I've also read that stiff rackets benefit more wrist type players as well.
Agree 100%. In a way, it's a never ending journey to find that specific type of racket for you. Plus the longer you play and get "better", there is always that drive to try different types of racket to see if it works or not, until a point where you feel "satisfied".
Based on what lining rackets that I used earlier I.e n7ii, n9ii, Tc08c, 3D caliber 900, TC 50. The spec always hits the bulls eye every time in LN as compared to yonex. For example, when yonex says stiff shaft, it’s not actually stiff for every players, at least from what i heard of (I know the bending capabilities depends on the player and swing) but when LN says stiff it does translate to stiff with almost all players.. the balance point and all are spot on in LN. Their QC is impeccable!!
Yes it is true. Player rackets are generally heavier.
Welcome to the world of Li Ning
do we need more proof that current marketing strategy didnt work. It doesnt help us providing ton of racket list & create even more confusion for us.
They could seriously use a couple of brand managers over there. This naming scheme hasn't even been around all that long, and yet they want to change it again...that's not how you win over Western customers, they're all confused where their racket model went and dont want to spend hours researching which one replaced it, only to be replaced yet AGAIN.... we tend to be a conservative bunch when it comes to sports equipment, still saw Armortecs and Arcsabers around last time we were allowed to playFirst of all, I think we are far too early in the process to say anything relevant about those upcoming rackets. Heck, they are not even painted yet and we don't now a thing about specs.
Apart from that, it looks like another classic Li-Ning move to cause maximum confusion. Instead of replacing their current lineup bit by bit with new rackets or to intruduce one new series at a time, they want to smash everything and build up their whole catalogue brand new. A marketing nightmare.
Also, I'm missing the Tectonics to fit in there somehow. Do they want to finish that series after two releases?
And that they are going back to the good ol' Nxx naming for their strings now is just...
