HiddenPower
Regular Member
I had enough of your "on the high horse" BS.
The BWF wants the player to give their "best efforts" to win. And that's what they did.
What I don't understand is, you seem to blame everything on the players. Those players did what they had to do and what's logical to do. If I have to give a number, I'd say 50% fault go to the players (and their coaches), and BWF is at least 50% to blame for this. Don't give me that why no one said anything to BWF before OLY question. Who are the players to question BWF's decision? Do they ever listen? The most one can do is adapting the new rule and live with it!
These players trained hard for 4 years, they don't deserve to get DQ because of some crappy bureaucratic rule. My hearts are with them.
And what the heck did BWF said for themselves in this? NOTHING!
The BWF wants the player to give their "best efforts" to win. And that's what they did.
What I don't understand is, you seem to blame everything on the players. Those players did what they had to do and what's logical to do. If I have to give a number, I'd say 50% fault go to the players (and their coaches), and BWF is at least 50% to blame for this. Don't give me that why no one said anything to BWF before OLY question. Who are the players to question BWF's decision? Do they ever listen? The most one can do is adapting the new rule and live with it!
These players trained hard for 4 years, they don't deserve to get DQ because of some crappy bureaucratic rule. My hearts are with them.
And what the heck did BWF said for themselves in this? NOTHING!
Emotion? Try mere logic and calling BS when I see it.
Yet, they got DQ'd for breaking the rules (ie cheating).
From the BWF's website: "The pairs were charged under BWF’s Players’ Code of Conduct – Sections 4.5 and 4.16 respectively – with “not using one’s best efforts to win a match” and “conducting oneself in a manner that is clearly abusive or detrimental to the sport”."
There is no specific law about squirting someone with battery acid however if you do so you won't be charged with "squirting someone with battery acid" you'll be charged under the assault laws.
It's not about morality, it's about the simple application of the rules.
Not that easy actually, first I'd have to buy and install an AC unit. Though why one is a key ingredient for being an 'internet tough guy' escapes me.
As I've said numerous times and you've failed to address numerous times is that these ladies received clear warnings their actions would be considered a violation of the rules and that if they continued with those actions they would face the consequences. At that point there's no gray area.
You and others keep saying they have a job to do and that job is to win gold. What you haven't explained is how getting DQ'd works towards that goal?
Yes the system should get the blame however a faulty system doesn't absolve the players of all responsibility for their actions.
No dispute with this point but could someone provide a link to any kind of public statement by a coach or player warning about this?