I'm saying a sports association is massively hypocritical if they accept sponsorships from companies that focus on products that are immensely detrimental to your health and cause the deaths of millions. There is not even a 'responsible' amount to consume cigarettes in. Even alcoholic beverages as sponsors are somewhat iffy imop, but there's at least some plausible deniability there (no health detriment proven in small amounts).
Personally, I'd be okay with governments banning tobacco because of the health detriment and massive costs it causes (all those cancer patients, for example), but I'm not saying it must be done (other substances should be unbanned in that event though). I don't think banning them from sponsoring sporting teams via law is quite necessary, but Im pretty sure no sporting association in the developed world allows it.
Whatever. I don't really care that much one way or another, but I'll consider all athletes and sports associations who accept that kind of sponsorship massive hypocrites and morally bankrupt. They're basically whores for whoever wants to put their logo on them if they accept sponsorships that are diametrically opposed to everything they do and should stand for.
And another one that has worldwide effect : http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201812/19/WS5c19dc96a3107d4c3a001a55.html