Reduce length of matches sounds like an own goal. Are we trying to increase the popularity of badminton by having less exposure?
Changing ends after six points in the fifth game sound ludicrous - remember we used to have to change ends after 7 points once upon a time ago and that system got trashed.
Half the words are "peaks", and I have no idea what "peaks" means.
Also, in what way is 5 x 11 "easier to understand" than 3 x 21?
First thought:They should get rid of the doubles service line, IMO - too many rallies are killed off within five shots of the serve.
These said peaks were first seen in the OP (of 2014?) with a bold ambitious title 'Enhancing Badminton's Future'
Briefly, the 3x21 format has a lopsided 2-game to 3-game ratio which was according to their presentation 61:39. Which means that 61% of all matches were decided within 2 games.
The 5x11 will bring this ratio 33:37:30 for matches finishing in 3, 4, and rubber (5) games.
In other words, thr rubber game ratio will be reduced from the current 39% to 30!
How this builds suspense, increases excitement, and shortens length of matches, only time will let us know.
Is it really going to be fair? I would think that servers will get a bit of an advantage if receiver will have to stay more to the back... It is more or less balanced as it is with 1.15 serve... Perhaps change of serve height will be needed too?They should get rid of the doubles service line, IMO - too many rallies are killed off within five shots of the serve.
It is almost universally considered to be a disadvantage to be on serve, at the top level.Is it really going to be fair? I would think that servers will get a bit of an advantage if receiver will have to stay more to the back... It is more or less balanced as it is with 1.15 serve... Perhaps change of serve height will be needed too?
Wasn't it the original idea behind the servicing rules for badminton for the server scoring? It was "fair" for the server to work for the point.It is almost universally considered to be a disadvantage to be on serve, at the top level.
I would challenge that idea.It is almost universally considered to be a disadvantage to be on serve, at the top level.
That's a great idea! Why didn't we think of it earlier!!!Instead of 11x5...how about 3x21?