As expected, Jung Jae Sung/Lee Young Dae secure final spot, beat China young pair Chai Biao/Zhang Nan, 21-16 and close game 22-20.
cooler said lee/jung need to play 100% to take the 1st set then i mention that is sound like chai/zhang is as good as the 3 pair i mentioned as u quote mine and said better than lp/jr the object should be chai/zhang and not the others 3 pair i am talking about chai/zhang is there any connection between chai/zhang with boe/morgensen,cai/fu,kido/hendra is better than lp/jr? of course i didnt get what u mean,because it is not related to what i am talking with cooler==
ZN/CB is technically good... JJS/LYD did need to put up 100% fight... ZN/CB did demonstrate good potential, not just one off show, or fluke...
i mean why u didn't put lp/jr name on that list together with Boe / Mogensen, Cai / Fu, Kindra??? why???? u think that LP / JR is not as good as them??? or u feel shame to put their name coz Chai Biao / Zhang Nan beat them even Once??? look at the score now,, and LYD / JJS of course must play 100% to won.. u want to denied cooler statement,,, coz u think that Chai Biao / Zhang Nan is not that good so that LYD / JJS doesn't need to play 100% to beat them....
hmm go and read back what urs reply when quoting my post u said: better than lp/jr who is better than lp/jr in ur post? as for the last question read post 71
hmmm.. just one question for u... when u made this statement why u don't put JR/LP name together with Boe / Mogensen, Cai / Fu and kindra??