So the fact that the tournament is cheap and has bad circumstances makes it worth more? You got it backwards, a tournament with challenges produces fairer results (correction of wildly wrong line calls, no possibility of cheating or incompetent linesmen like in the 2008 Korea Open or All England, for example) and is thus worth more, as the better player can't be cheated out of his victory as easily. Not saying that the lack of Hawkeye makes this a worthless tournament but it's certainly embarrassing af, even more so as I've read multiple times now that the linesmen are basically blind (or paid off, which I don't really think)...
I just realized that the new asiad ms and ws champions will clinch gold without World champion titles in their hands, and maybe this situation can happen again in 3 other disciplines
