1. Dreaming
2. Line judges, not Boe![]()
1. Kindly share your thoughts on how badminton is as bad compared to soccer. Looking forward on that.
2. Keep on dreaming. My original post was referring to Boe's showmanship not the linesman.
1. Dreaming
2. Line judges, not Boe![]()
Hopefully get some comment from flite![]()
Agreed with you guys. I think bias calls happened everywhere but this was just too obvious. Unfortunately for the Koreans and Chinese when up against the Danes, it was called on them at the critical moments of the match and it kills them off.
On a side note, Boe's sportmanship is also very questionable. At one point when the replay clearly showed that the shuttle landed on the line (was called out by linesmen) and Boe was there seeing it, he gestured strongly to the Chinese pair that it was out whereby he knew it was good.
Is play-acting taking place in badminton?
But you don't acknowledge the deficiency of the linesmenNo doubt in my sentences I stated the word linesman but the objective was on Boe's gesturing to the opponents the shuttle was out. He was there watching the shuttle landed. My last line supported my statement.
Need any further explanation?
Who's promoting? My view is it's something that can be expected to happen - people should equip themselves to handle such situations better psychologically rather than whine and lose.Play acting is not common yet in badminton although they bound to have certain black sheep. So don't promote it.
But you don't acknowledge the deficiency of the linesmen
Who's promoting? My view is it's something that can be expected to happen - people should equip themselves to handle such situations better psychologically rather than whine and lose.
hahaha, let's leave it at that then. I'm not whining at allI did at the beginning of the paragraph. Be it pure human error or on purpose.
Who is whining and who is the loser. I see no one whining about this issue today beside you and a selected few who is still smarting about yesterday's posting. So who is the whiner?
hahaha, let's leave it at that then. I'm not whining at allI did at the beginning of the paragraph. Be it pure human error or on purpose.
Who is whining and who is the loser. I see no one whining about this issue today beside you and a selected few who is still smarting about yesterday's posting. So who is the whiner?
hahaha, let's leave it at that then. I'm not whining at all![]()
View attachment 93218
I am not being bias at all... even both commentators said "MB gets awefully close to have his serves be at fault as well" "he has been known...that's for sure..."
I don't make a comment without any ground.
Nothing wrong with that either ... Waist = bottom rib, cork of shuttle
9.1.5 the whole shuttle shall be below the server’s waist at the instant of being hit by the server’s racket. The waist shall be considered to be an imaginary line round the body, level with the lowest part of the server’s bottom rib;
9.1.6 the shaft of the server’s racket at the instant of hitting the shuttle shall be pointing in a downward direction;
Nothing in here about the racket face needing to point downwards? Unless by racket face you actually meant shaft.
Also View attachment 93620
Looks pretty borderline to me.
9.1.5 the whole shuttle shall be below the server’s waist at the instant of being hit by the server’s racket. The waist shall be considered to be an imaginary line round the body, level with the lowest part of the server’s bottom rib;
9.1.6 the shaft of the server’s racket at the instant of hitting the shuttle shall be pointing in a downward direction;
Nothing in here about the racket face needing to point downwards? Unless by racket face you actually meant shaft.
.
Thank you for confirming my(and the service judge's) viewpoint. If you think that Boe's serve was on the borderline, Guo and Chai's serves were definitely way over the limit. Hence, they deserve the service faults called.Also
Looks pretty borderline to me
Looks pretty borderline to me.