CRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Our MAS pair lost!!!!! Haih..anyways..good outing for u guys! Cheers!
Not to forget Boonsak FOUGHT all the way AGAINST top pair, firstly, beat (1) PWC, (2) Lee Hyun Ill (3) Simon Santoso (4) Park Tae Sang (5) Chen Jin Wahhhh ! ?? ?? All GOOD PLAYERS, im amazed by his performance !
Before the SO,Boonsak was just one of the players at most a semi-finalist in some major tournaments.But now,he has reached a rung higher,entering finals and winning tournaments.Who is behind this vast improvement?Or is it,he has finally got his law degree and is now completely immerse in badminton only.Most probably,he plays a thinking game and with that I think he will take the Thailand Open tomorrow.
Chen Jin lost to Boonsak and Boonsak lost to LCW in the IO, then Chen Jin should pose no danger to LCW. Pure logic ! I like it more and more - really looking forward to LCW's win in the WC.
Great tournament for Hongyan, but Zhu's really very strong. What about Jung-Lee/Panvisvas-Prapakamol ? Are they still playing?
Boonsak beat almost all the top MS in the world but the one he had difficuilties to beat is LCW.He often lost to LCW in the match including the recent IO.Anyway,really hope to see tomorrow final between him and CH.I put my bet on him because i feel CH form is not so good since he left the national squad.Hope to see he win in his own country.
boonsak was defeated by taufik in IO... Taufik HIDAYAT[INA] - [THA] Boonsak PONSANA 21-14 20-22 21-14 it was a close game though...
Unfortunately, this logic doesn'st apply in badminton. If A can beat B and B can beat C, it doesn't necesarily means A can beat C because A, B, C each has his strength and weaknesses. A's style of play might give B lots of trouble, and B's style of play might give C lots of trouble, but C's style of play can give A trouble. For example, let's say A is very aggressive attacking style player who has a very powerful smash and likes to use it all the time. If B is the type of player who likes to move players all over 4 corners and he is also very quick at returning smashes at the sidelines but is weak at returning powerful smashes directed at his body, A probably can beat B if he just keeps smashing at B's body. Let's say C is a always very good at returning smashes, but he's slow at moving round all 4 corners of the court. He can beat A because he will return all of A's smashes and gradually tired him out. However, he's likely to lose to B because B will move him around all corners - which is B's strength and C's weaknesses. Since C's smash is not as effective as A's, he'll have trouble smashing the bird by B. Above hyperthetical situation illustruates that due to different type of playing style, strength and weaknesses, A can beat B and B can beat C, but C will beat A back in return.
You are probably right. He can now concentrate on badminton more since there are no more exams to worry.First thing I noted in SO07 is his much improved fitness and stamina.Anyone can work on that if he 's motivated to do better(distinctive exception being TH). However I believe his new INA coach deserves the greater credit.His tactics are so spot on and BP has the skills to execute them. LD, RS and CY lost to BP in SO07 largely because they were outwitted. CH has an easy SF, other than that both spent similar time on court. I was surprised at how tamely CJ lost the G3 because he won his earlier matches easily. BP should defeat CH based on tactics.
Boonsak is always just brilliant to watch . I really love his style. Hope he can beat Chen Hong tomorrow! I know he has it in him (he's more than proven it this year), just hope it all goes well on the day .
