Stringbed frequency to monitor string tension

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by visor, Feb 27, 2013.

  1. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Hmmm... as I understand, the foam is placed inside the T joint, not throughout the whole frame, right? I don't think I've ever seen any foam in the frame in any of the broken rackets post mortem photos.
     
  2. blableblibloblu

    blableblibloblu Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Canada
    http://bbs.badmintoncn.com/thread-196139-1-1.html
    not quite sure exactly where they put it since I haven't looked at the whole thread and haven't translated what he says. Doesn't seem to be in the whole frame though. Could still have an impact on frequency though, I think.
     
  3. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    If anybody hasn't got an iPhone - I can't be the only one - there's a free program called PitchPerfect that does exactly the same thing on a PC. All you need is a microphone of some kind.

    Just tested a couple of strings against generated tones, and they sound spot on. Now I've got some kind of objective measure of tension loss, but this means I'm probably going to re-test everything. Thanks, OCD!
     
  4. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Interesting to see how much tension is lost early on... just tested the Adidas Power Tour 66, and it's gone from 1277 Hz to 1228 Hz in 12 hrs before it's even hit a shuttle! 3.8%, IOW.

    Looking forward to seeing the "fresh" frequency of Zymax 62 at 30x31...
     
  5. msitpro

    msitpro Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    IT consultant
    Location:
    Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
    Mark, did you ever get a reading for ZM62 @ 30x31 ?

    Contribution:

    ZM65 @ 26x28 on NR700RP using crank machine tension tested with scales immediately before

    0hrs = 1189 Hz
     
  6. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    As a reference, my ZM62 @22x23 lbs ECP :
    0hr = 1212 Hz
     
  7. msitpro

    msitpro Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    IT consultant
    Location:
    Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
    That frequency looks more like 26 lbs based on other results in this thread?!
     
  8. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Yes, and that's the wonder of super thin strings. :)
     
  9. msitpro

    msitpro Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2012
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    10
    Occupation:
    IT consultant
    Location:
    Ipswich, Suffolk, United Kingdom
    Your original post lists these results:

    So, 100 Hz lost in 3 weeks??!!!

    Kwun's chart and results suggests approx 26lbs as well, and that's with ZM62 being used.

    Were they measured on the same make and string pattern of racquet? Just seems too high. I would expect somewhere around 1140 - 1170 freshly strung looking at others' results.
     
  10. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Yes: fresh out of the machine... 1366 Hz.

    Another one for the pot:

    Adidas Power Hybrid:

    [TABLE="width: 204"]
    [TR]
    [TD]0[/TD]
    [TD]1284[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]1[/TD]
    [TD]1274[/TD]
    [TD]0.78[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]3[/TD]
    [TD]1263[/TD]
    [TD]1.64[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]6[/TD]
    [TD]1257[/TD]
    [TD]2.10[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]12[/TD]
    [TD]1249[/TD]
    [TD]2.73[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]24[/TD]
    [TD]1241[/TD]
    [TD]3.35[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]48[/TD]
    [TD]1234[/TD]
    [TD]3.89[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]72[/TD]
    [TD]1230[/TD]
    [TD]4.21[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]1st session[/TD]
    [TD]1210[/TD]
    [TD]5.76
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]
     
    #70 Mark A, Jun 12, 2013
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2013
  11. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    This is xp70 #2 by stringer b.
    After 2 wks and 6hrs play it has dropped to 1155 Hz.
     
  12. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Of those rackets with zm62 @22x23 lbs in my op, they were strung by stringer A. Iirc at 0h they were around 1180 Hz.
     
  13. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    The *stabilized* stringbed frequencies I get do match perfectly with kwun's graph on page 1 for a single string of zm62. Note stabilized after a few days, not immediately off the machine.

    So I'd expect Mark's 31 lbs to stabilize around 1300.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. blableblibloblu

    blableblibloblu Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Canada
    Your power hybrid frequencies are pretty much what I also get.
    I strung my MXJJS and SW35 at 30 lbs and theyre staying at 1200 after about 3 sessions
     
  15. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Well...

    [TABLE="width: 142"]
    [TR]
    [TD]0[/TD]
    [TD]1366[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]1[/TD]
    [TD]1352[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]3[/TD]
    [TD]1343[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]6[/TD]
    [TD]1334[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]12[/TD]
    [TD]1322[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]24[/TD]
    [TD]1313[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]48[/TD]
    [TD]BROKE
    [/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    Yep - it broke before I even got the chance to play with it. I suspect two things:

    1. It was Z62 Mk1 - I was after Mk2,
    2. There was a nick in the string - it's happened before, especially with Ashaway.

    I don't know how or why it lasted two days, though.
     
  16. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Lol... I think 31lbs has totally exceeded ZM62's elastic limit. :)
     
  17. blableblibloblu

    blableblibloblu Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2011
    Messages:
    345
    Likes Received:
    2
    Occupation:
    student
    Location:
    Canada
    Hmm it seems as if powerhybrid has good tension retention up until you play with it. Dropped all the way down to 1170 hz.

    But then again, when I string ZM70 in the low 30's, I really don't see the tension retention everyone talks about as it seems to drop a lot. I guess it's something you have to live with when you string it over 28 lbs?

    Makes me want to try thinner strings at lower tensions
     
  18. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Update of my most recent zm62 @ 22x23 lbs:

    1212Hz 0h
    1180 24h rest
    1155 6h play
    1145 8h play
    1135 10h play
     
  19. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    The percentage of tension loss seems to be the constant, so those of us who use 30+ are going to feel 3+ lb more than the low 20's crew feels 2 lb...

    I really think rougher strings suffer from this sudden drop in play more than smooth ones do, though, and the Mk1 Z70 was pretty rough.
     
  20. Mark A

    Mark A Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2005
    Messages:
    7,170
    Likes Received:
    695
    Location:
    St Helens, UK
    Another one for the pot:

    NS30 (white) 30x32, Rev.

    [TABLE="width: 234"]
    [TR]
    [TD]hrs[/TD]
    [TD]pitch (Hz)[/TD]
    [TD]total % loss[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]0[/TD]
    [TD]1320[/TD]
    [TD][/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]1[/TD]
    [TD]1308[/TD]
    [TD]0.91[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]3[/TD]
    [TD]1294[/TD]
    [TD]1.97[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]6[/TD]
    [TD]1283[/TD]
    [TD]2.80[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]12[/TD]
    [TD]1273[/TD]
    [TD]3.56[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]24[/TD]
    [TD]1262[/TD]
    [TD]4.39[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]48[/TD]
    [TD]1246[/TD]
    [TD]5.61[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]72[/TD]
    [TD]N/A[/TD]
    [TD]N/A[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]1st session[/TD]
    [TD]1232[/TD]
    [TD]6.67[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [TR]
    [TD]2nd session[/TD]
    [TD]1206[/TD]
    [TD]8.64[/TD]
    [/TR]
    [/TABLE]

    8.6% loss after two sessions... not brilliant.
     

Share This Page