As I posted earlier that The Scoring Points are counted from BWF Ranking Points, not based on real betting or public opinion. If you meet World#1 vs unranked player you will see the scoring pts like it.
How about a wildcard draw of NO.[..] MT001: [ ]Cooler.[Q].......... v [ ]Lin.Dan. (3).........(.100,000 - 1 ) delete [ ] You can reach #1 PAW ranking from just 1 pick More bang for the buck here
NO.[28] MT602: [ ]Zhou.Mi.[1].......... v [x]Xin.Wang.(Q).........(. 2 - 50 ) delete [ ] NO.[29] MT608: [x]Long.Chen.[7]........ v [ ]Yun.Hu.[8]...........( 10 - 10 ) delete [ ] NO.[30] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ] Alternate: NO.[30] MT617: [x]Nan.Zhang/Lu.Lu...... v [ ]Z.B.Chen/J.K.Zhang...( 19 - 5 .) delete
It won't happened, the scoring should be around 40s - 2 I used minimum ranking pts (like as 3000 rkpts) for unranked player not zero ranking pts, that's why you see a lot of 10-10 pts in some lower tier tournament.
NO.[..] MT608: [x ]Long.Chen.[7]........ v [ ]Yun.Hu.[8]...........( 10 - 10 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x ]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT617: [x ]Nan.Zhang/Lu.Lu...... v [ ]Z.B.Chen/J.K.Zhang...( 19 - 5 .) delete [ ]
NO.[29] MT608: [X]Long.Chen.[7]........ v [ ]Yun.Hu.[8]...........( 10 - 10 ) delete [ ] NO.[30] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [X]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ]
Final NO.[..] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT617: [X]Nan.Zhang/Lu.Lu...... v [ ]Z.B.Chen/J.K.Zhang...( 19 - 5 .) delete [ ]
NO.[30] MT602: [ ]Zhou.Mi.[1].......... v [x]Xin.Wang.(Q).........(. 2 - 50 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x ]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ]
NO.[..] MT602: [ ]Zhou.Mi.[1].......... v [x]Xin.Wang.(Q).........(. 2 - 50 ) delete [ ] NO.[alt] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT614: [ ]M.Ahsan/B.Septano.[1] v [x]Alvent.Y/Hendra.G.[5](. 8 - 12 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT617: [x]Nan.Zhang/Lu.Lu...... v [ ]Z.B.Chen/J.K.Zhang...( 19 - 5 .) delete [ ]
Haiya, no choice. I'm praying LYB has set out his orders to favour the juniors: NO.[..] MT617: [x]Nan.Zhang/Lu.Lu...... v [ ]Z.B.Chen/J.K.Zhang...( 19 - 5 .) delete [ ]
NO.[..] MT602: [ ]Zhou.Mi.[1].......... v [x]Xin.Wang.(Q).........(. 2 - 50 ) delete [ ] If too late, then: NO.[..] MT609: [ ]Irawati/Jauhari.[1].. v [x]Ling.Gao/Yili.Wei....(. 7 - 14 ) delete [ ]
I just found out that my yesterday's paws on Zhang Nan/Lu Lu and Chen ZB/Zhang JK were invalid..I should have got 20 added points.....:crying::crying::crying: NO.[30] MT608: [x]Long.Chen.[7]........ v [ ]Yun.Hu.[8]...........( 10 - 10 ) delete [ ] NO.[..] MT614: [ ]M.Ahsan/B.Septano.[1] v [x]Alvent.Y/Hendra.G.[5](. 8 - 12 ) delete [ ]