You see the proble here? You debate based on what is apple, what is orange from your point of view. When I try to say, "sir, your apple is actually an orange, and your orange is actually an apple", you tried to used your original biased definition to say I am wrong. My whole point is, how you say I am wrong, when your definition and my definition is not the same to begin with? To me, "gamemanship" is simple as one side use whatever method to gain advantage over the other side during competition. Your definition limit such during actual on court play, but my definition is broader to cover the sport, including event structure and regulation. Why my definition is so wrong when compare to yours?