Is thinner or thicker string more durable? (Not in terms of breaking)

Discussion in 'Badminton String' started by SSSSNT, Jul 5, 2020.

  1. SSSSNT

    SSSSNT Regular Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    735
    Likes Received:
    161
    Location:
    Here
    Obviously thinner strings are more prone to breaking, but what about other factors of durability like going dead, repulsion loss, etc? I don't string with high tension, so it's rare that my string breaks regardless of how thin they are. What string would you recommend that is durable?
     
    ucantseeme likes this.
  2. ucantseeme

    ucantseeme Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2010
    Messages:
    5,077
    Likes Received:
    2,447
    Occupation:
    Z-Force II
    Location:
    Z-ForceII
    I personally never found one which exceed 20 hours for me. Each string I used (and it's a long list) lost a bunch of playability for my liking (repulsion and feel) after around 20 hours on court. Maybe I'm a bit fastidious due having a string machine at home and my tension is also a factor which let the string age faster, but it is quite noticeable. I personally think that the pulled tension also plays a role how long you can play a string within a tolerable area and what's your tolerable area and how much money has influence on your hobby.
     
  3. Budi

    Budi Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2019
    Messages:
    1,865
    Likes Received:
    896
    Location:
    Indonesia
    My newly strung racket just before this horrible lockdown, turn into crappy even if it just sleep in my bag for almost 2 month.

    Losing tension fast & easy to snap are the price for highly repulsive thin string.
    Tho some brand had different durability & tension hold but its due to their material. Coating & all but overall they more or less simillar each other.
     

Share This Page