Hawkeye. Not infallible.

Discussion in 'Rules / Tournament Regulation / Officiating' started by Maklike Tier, Apr 30, 2017.

  1. stradrider

    stradrider Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2011
    Messages:
    664
    Likes Received:
    309
    Location:
    Norway
    I cannot agree... Koki did not play very well during the whole match, lots of unforced mistakes with not so much initiative...Even the first set was won almost by mistake, probably Li got too complacent at 17, had it going too easy...
     
    blabl likes this.
  2. phihag

    phihag Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2014
    Messages:
    1,000
    Likes Received:
    709
    Location:
    Germany
    @blabl Sorry for the late answer, didn't see this discussion at first. As @stradrider pointed out, better start a new thread than post in an old one.

    Yes, certainly! Although technically, there's no scoring of any points; the rally is a let as soon as the situation of a let occurs, even if the umpire takes a second or two to verbalize that.

    In the example you mention here, the rally hasn't even started; the players have just hit a couple of shuttles. They are free to do that.

    No, there is no provisioning for the player to challenge any umpire's decision except line calls. If the player thinks the umpire's understanding of the laws is wrong, they can appeal to the referee. Neither is the case here; both players started to hit shuttles before the match resumed.

    It would be interesting to know the rationale for the appeal. Being a (presumably) professional coach, Keita Matsuda should know the rules, which clearly spell out in §17.6.8 that the referee can only be appealed to in questions of law. Which law did Matsuda think the umpire misunderstood?

    I'm not sure how the tournament or even other tournaments are related, but let's assume that the umpire has made a grievous error, such as calling a receiver fault when there was none (or not calling a fault that happened), and is not corrected by the service judge (or referee if it was a matter of law, not perception). Then per §17.5 of the laws, the decision stands. Although a call would be faulty, the result of the match is still valid.

    You will find similar rules in every sport: Incorrect calls should be avoided, but they are a part of sport. Even if you wanted to, it is not feasible to rectify an incorrect call by replaying a match. Umpires are neutral precisely so that any incorrect calls balance themselves out. And in badminton, one bad decision does not decide a match.

    Then he deserved to lose! The mental game is part of any tournament. There will always be something disrupting the player: Be it a draft, the playing time, the hotel, a fan, the noise, the light, a bad line call, an incorrect call, or even – as here – a correct call! A true champion perseveres, and mentally switches to the next rally.

    There's a simple remedy for that: Become an umpire yourself! The first umpiring grade is usually achievable with a weekend or two of training, and should be basically free. Learning the rules in detail will empower you to distinguish surprising but correct calls from umpire errors. And umpiring yourself will give you a better feeling of why an umpire may make a mistake.
     
    blabl and stradrider like this.
  3. blabl

    blabl Regular Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2015
    Messages:
    7,843
    Likes Received:
    320
    Location:
    earth
    @phihag and @stradrider

    Thank you very much for all your replies to my posts. I just need some clarification and all the explanation given by both of you helps a lot here. Really appreciate it and have a nice day. :);)
     

Share This Page