pcll99
Regular Member
In the match between Matsumoto/Takahashia vs Polii/Rahayu in the Badminton Asia Team Championship 2018 on 10 Feb 2018, the umpire called a service fault herself against the Indonesians--a foot fault. (The service judge was silent throughout.)
The Indonesians appealled to the referee and complained that the umpire cannot call a service fault herself independently--only the service judge can.
The referee agreed with the umpire.
Are the umpire and referee right? Can the umpire call a service fault if the service judge say nothing?
Postscript edit:
1. I read ITTO s 5.4.3, which says
4. Do Laws of Badminton take precedence over ITTO?
5. Can an umpire call a foot fault when such a fault was expressly reserved for the service judge to call by the Laws of Badminton?
The Indonesians appealled to the referee and complained that the umpire cannot call a service fault herself independently--only the service judge can.
The referee agreed with the umpire.
Are the umpire and referee right? Can the umpire call a service fault if the service judge say nothing?
Postscript edit:
1. I read ITTO s 5.4.3, which says
The Umpire shall, during the service, if a Service Judge is appointed, especially watch the receiver. The Umpire may also call a service fault.
2. But the Laws of Badminton s 17.3 says
The service judge shall call service faults made by the server should they occur (Law 9.1.2 to 9.1.9).
3. A foot fault is, I believe, either 9.1.3 or 9.1.4.
4. Do Laws of Badminton take precedence over ITTO?
5. Can an umpire call a foot fault when such a fault was expressly reserved for the service judge to call by the Laws of Badminton?
Last edited: