ArcSaber Z slash vs Nanospeed 9900

Arc Z required a LOT of adjustment for me, but I now have one for singles. IMO the NS9900 is too much work here: it's excellent in defence, but the head light balance gets to be a problem if you're clearing all the time. The Z wins purely because of its balance, but I agree it is overrated (and overpriced).
 
Jasonvan said:
ARC Z is an overrated racket that's hard to use and used to, not a very good choice....
Click to expand...
Out of the 2 choices the OP has given, unfortunately, the NS9900 is designed for doubles (eg. KKK/TBH) and the ArcZ is designed for singles (eg. Tago).
 
Z slash is more for singles :)
ns 9k9 is a double designed racquet

I never tried any of these two but on the paper (specs,reviews) ns 9k9 seems better
 
If you intend to use NS9900 for single, find a 2U.

Why dont you choose Arc10, all around racket and it is more user friendly than ArcZ.
 
but Arcsaber 10 the head is heavier than Z slash...this is what i fell...Nanospeed 9900 i heard most of them said easy to control and balance...I am confused now... =(
 
WoRLd PeACe said:
but Arcsaber 10 the head is heavier than Z slash...this is what i fell...
Click to expand...

is it because u tried swinging them? the arc z has a slimmer and more aerodynamic frame compared to arc 10. it cuts through the air more easily, giving the arc z a more head light feel compared to the arc 10. with just holding them however, the arc z should feel slightly more head heavy.

just my 2 cents..
 
i see...hmmm...no wonder most of the international players are still using Arcsaber 10 rather than Z slash... so final decision made? Arcsaber 10 ? anyone here has more ideas?
 
beginners, or should i say even some pros have difficulty adjusting to the ARC-Z. I think its wise to take the ARC-10 instead of the ARC-Z.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top