NanoSpeed 9000 Review

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by ants, Jan 16, 2006.

  1. CoolDoo6

    CoolDoo6 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2006
    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    London, UK
    Racket manufacturing doesn't appear to be very precise. I can tell from the depth of the hole drilled into the bottom of the handle. Every racket has more or less a unique depth, even for rackets in the same U class.
     
  2. storkbill

    storkbill Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    sg
    I have a 2U and 3U Ti-10, date code within 3 months of each other. The 2U was manufactured later and is head-heavier + absolute weight heavier than my 3U. Looks like i have plenty of off-spec racquets Which is not a bad thing, because a head-heavier NS9000S really rocks :D
     
  3. MusclePower100

    MusclePower100 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    Messages:
    539
    Likes Received:
    14
    Location:
    N/A
    Awesome Racquet!!!!
     
  4. taneepak

    taneepak Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2004
    Messages:
    6,526
    Likes Received:
    25
    Occupation:
    Designing and producing quality feather shuttlecoc
    Location:
    Hong Kong
    Head-heaviness is not necessarily the same as balance point. You can have a racquet that feels head-heavy yet it has the same balance point as a less head-heavy racquet. Balance point (static b/p) is a finishing qc part of racquet manufacturing. Head-heaviness feel is not.
     
  5. sifuyono

    sifuyono Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    Messages:
    793
    Likes Received:
    1
    Occupation:
    Follow me on Twitter: @sifuyono
    Location:
    Surabaya - Indonesia
    i would like to ask:
    1. is it true that ns9000x there's no muscle power in frame?
    2. my ns9000x so vibrate (specially in grip) when receive shuttlecock from hard hitter, is it normal?
    thank you, any suggestion welcome
     
  6. martin8768

    martin8768 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2006
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    3
    Occupation:
    sudent
    Location:
    ONTARIO,CANADA
    humm long long time ago, around post 466 or something, u were tlaking about the shaft and handle lenght relative to the stiffness of the racket, ex: X is shorter=stiffer, S is longer=more flex and you also talked about longer is better for singles(more reach), so S is better for singles cuz its longer, but its better for doubles becuz its more manovarable, wow. im glade i got type S, best of everything, sepically cuz i think X is to stiff, i can give a small review about the S, specially seeing how everyone wants to get a X instead for S, maybe S can be just as good:p
     
  7. Sealman

    Sealman Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    4,276
    Likes Received:
    22
    Occupation:
    Racquet Collector
    Location:
    Singapore
    Noticed many players used the NS9000 during the recent World Championships. Endorsement issues aside, the NS9000 seem to be quite well-received by the players as compared to when NS7000/NS8000 was released.
     
  8. ants

    ants Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Messages:
    13,202
    Likes Received:
    51
    Occupation:
    Entrepreneur , Modern Nomad
    Location:
    Malaysian Citizen of the World
    Its because it is a good racket. Well balanced in terms of performance.
     
  9. malayali

    malayali Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2004
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    4
    Occupation:
    namaskaaram..
    Location:
    Dallas,TX. (From India)
    Do you guys know if the X type or the S type is more popular among professional players ???
     
  10. zzz...

    zzz... Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    SG
    I think Type S is more popular. In WC, from what I have seen in TV, these are the players using it.
    1. Lee Chong Wei
    2. Bao Chun Lai
    3. Zhang Ning
    4. Xie Xing Fang
    5. Gao Ling
    6. Cai Yun

    Chong Tan Fook, not sure though, believed he has switch back to Ti10 old colour.
     
  11. zzz...

    zzz... Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2006
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    SG
    In addition, dun think have seen any player using Type X.
     
  12. LazyBuddy

    LazyBuddy Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2002
    Messages:
    10,096
    Likes Received:
    15
    Occupation:
    Engineer
    Location:
    New York, US
    How you be able to tell whether it's S or X from TV? :eek:
     
  13. SWC_Ant

    SWC_Ant Regular Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2004
    Messages:
    552
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Student
    Location:
    Richmond, BC; Hamilton, ON
    he could tell from the way the shafts flexed when the pro's swung the racket ;)
     
  14. cooler

    cooler Regular Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    Messages:
    21,811
    Likes Received:
    23
    Occupation:
    Surfing, reading fan mails:D, Dilithium Crystal hu
    Location:
    Basement Boiler Room
    How? He's zzz...:p
     
  15. twobeer

    twobeer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2003
    Messages:
    4,001
    Likes Received:
    14
    Occupation:
    computer
    Location:
    Sweden
    I sat pretty close court on WC and If Bao didn´t repaint the racket red, I am pretty sure he was NOT using an NS9K :p

    /Twobeer
     
  16. Slacker

    Slacker Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2004
    Messages:
    467
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Baddy Fanatic/Addict FULL-TIME!!!
    Location:
    Singapore
    Hmmmm....from the just updated Yonex website http://www.yonex.com/badminton/player/topics.html,

    Gao Ling, Xie Xing Fang and Cai Yun all uses NS9K S. :)
     
  17. Smash Boy

    Smash Boy Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2006
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Cornwall
    Hi ants,
    I am a 13 year old county player,who is well built, and likes to "kill" at every opportunity.
    Would I be able to use the Nanospeed 9000 Type X?
    People have said,Because of my age I wouldnt be able to get any power in the shots,and would not be worth the investment.
    Could you recommend me to either GEt this, Or NOT to get this, and if I do get,what tension to string it at and the best possible strings IYO.
    Thanks alot,
    -Smash
     
  18. johnnytanki

    johnnytanki Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    Hi all,

    I had been using cab8 for near to 20 years, and sometimes during play, there might be chance where racket hit together with my partner, but there isnt muct problem with the paintwork at all.

    Recently i just bought a nano9k and had been playing it for near to a month. One thing i noticed is that the paint work is really suck. The paint work on the frame had been coming off after a few hit with my partner. Although the racket is light and powerful which i like, but i am wondering why a top end racket paintwork is such poorly finish and seems like the frame is really soft.

    Any feedback from any bros who use nano9k? Thanks
     
  19. storkbill

    storkbill Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 15, 2005
    Messages:
    535
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    sg
    That's the way metallic paint chips. Find any other racquet with metallic paint and it'll be the same result.

    Cab 8 is metal head and carbon shaft right? paint probably sticks better to metal than to carbon/plastic.
     
  20. johnnytanki

    johnnytanki Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2006
    Messages:
    20
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Singapore
    ic, thanks for the advice. Just hope that my racket wont break easily, not really a big problem when the paint chip off. thanks aggain
     

Share This Page