Compact quad head shapes by design nature amplify / concentrate more force around a smaller sweetspot zone. Isometric designs on the other hand have larger sweetspots, but this actually results in force being dispersed over that larger region. This is why I believe isometric shapes and large frames to be inferior over compact quads and ovals. The optimal striking zone is towards the racquets extreme top half to begin with; why suffer the disadvantages in exchange for an unused section of the stringbed?
this thread seems old but I'm just wondering does anyone happen to know if Kolding uses the 2U or 3U version of the Duora 10?
Recently bought the Duora 10 Legends' Vision and I can confirm it's identical to the original in terms of stiffness. The only difference is that you get the signatures of the 4 legends on the shaft.
how about duora10 LCW new color? anybody here use duora LCW jewel blue? any different from the legend vision series?
I've all the duora series. There's slight difference in terms of stiffness weight and even grip size. D10 black. Stiff heavy g5 D10 lcw. Stiff less Heavy g5 D10 jewel. Less stiff less heavy smaller g5 D10 lv. Less stiff less heavy smaller g5 Anyone feels the same?
I am really getting bored with all those colours.... When do you think they accept custom colouring for rackets?
Any review on the latest Orange&Blue Duora 10? Would like to buy one . Sent from my ASUS_X00DD using Tapatalk
I'm also fed up with this color game of Yonex. Especially, every time they introduce a new color, it is a different racket inside. Directly announce a Ver.2 would be preferred.