RKEP Rackets

Discussion in 'Badminton Rackets / Equipment' started by blindfury, Jan 29, 2013.

  1. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    Ah I see, thanks for letting me know! If only I could have edited it...
    Next time I'll be sure to mention its proper head shape :)
     
  2. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    The XP's are really a hybrid of MX and BS frames. So it has an octagonal cross section lower half like MX and a sword shaped cross section top half like BS.

    And like the BS, the top half is pinched in at 10-11 o'clock and 1-2 o'clock. Just look at any BS and you'll understand what I mean.

    For this reason (lighter head mass) and it's sword cross section, BS is known for it's amazing speed and maneuverability.

    BS has been like this for a long while, it's not oval, not semi iso, nor tweener. :p
     
    #282 visor, Sep 22, 2013
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2013
  3. Udonming

    Udonming Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2010
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    my den
    ScreenHunter_03 Sep. 30 09.13.gif
    Are you guys having racket strung by Eric like this one ?
     
  4. teoky

    teoky Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Singapore
    I bought a 2nd hand XP70 that weigh 88gm and with 300mm bp (dry). Just had a session with it and it is indeed a very fast racquet, very good for drive and decent power as well.

    I am impressed with it, one of the better racquet in my collection. At the price point, it is really value for money.
     
    #284 teoky, Oct 1, 2013
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2013
  5. phaaam

    phaaam Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2008
    Messages:
    415
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Canada
    Which racket is that?

    Anyway, if I recall correctly, mine had that long string from L12-L08 as well or R12-R05. The reason is because at the end of the main strings at either L12 or R12 in your pictures, he tied the knot off at L08 or R05. It makes sense to me since those grommets are better suited to fit a string through to tie a knot. Was there a starting knot at L05? Regardless, nothing to worry about.

    Glad to hear about another happy XP70 user =) I measured one of mine and it was 85.3g and 299mm, a little lighter than my other rackets but still considered 3U. will wait for strings to snap before measuring the second.
     
    #285 phaaam, Oct 1, 2013
    Last edited: Oct 1, 2013
  6. yerrorice

    yerrorice Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Canada
    I did it.... I finally bought a XP-70 (87g, 300mm). Can't wait to try it! I initially thought the XP-70 would be too flexible for my liking but it's actually fairly stiff. From just flexing it, I'd say it's around as stiff as a NS9900 or Z-force.
     
  7. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    ^ I'm waiting for 2x XP70 (86/297). Got them as backups to my other 2, one of which I broke in a clash last wk.

    Having tried an MXJJS, I'd say it's the same stiffness. Easy to wield yet accurate.
     
  8. yerrorice

    yerrorice Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Canada
    ^Haha, you're going to buy all of Eric's rackets :p Hmm, I was quite curious about the MXJJS and wanted to try it for some time now. I almost bought it but decided to go with the XP-70 instead because I can choose the specs. Do you find 86g a bit light? 87g feels fairly lighter than my BS10 which I thought was already light.
     
  9. bakulaw

    bakulaw Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Korea
    did you try a 4U or a 3U MX-JJS?

    what XP70 specs do you think will play most similar?
     
  10. bos_dc2

    bos_dc2 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    What RKEP racquet would be most similar to a NR-Zspeed?
     
  11. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    I'm more of a control counter attacking style, so speed and accuracy trumps rear court smash power, for me.

    4U. Same spec especially same head wt would play similar. :)

    ZSPD is an unusual racket... at least the demo I had tried from Topline. I'd say an XP80 (88/300) would be close. I know because I've ordered one for my friend with those specs a few months ago and it has a similar swing, although not as fast as the more compact ZSPD. But ZSPD would have more oomph at the expense of defence.
     
  12. bakulaw

    bakulaw Regular Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2009
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Korea
    Follow up question... would you say that the XP70 is more similar to an MX-JJS or an MX-70?
     
  13. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    I have 2x MX70, one 3U one 4U. So i know definitely XP70 is closer to JJS, especially shaft stiffness of MX70 is noticeably stiffer than both.
     
  14. yerrorice

    yerrorice Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Canada
    RKEP XP-70 (87, 300mm, strung at 26lbs with Zymax 62) first impressions:

    At first, the racket felt dull and a bit heavy, nothing too special. As I continued to play however, the racket showed its true colours (and yes, I spell colour with "ou", I'm Canadian :p). I warmed up with a few clears and to my surprise, they were all going out! I had to adjust my swing to handle the power. Next, I tried smashing and the smashes were beautiful!! I was able to smash fairly hard from the back court (which I normally avoid from the lack of confidence :p) and from awkward positions. I normally wouldn't talk about accuracy since you can be "accurate" with any racket if you play enough with it. But this racket gave me extremely sharp smashing angles for some reason :confused:. Moving on to smashes around mid-court, these smashes were on par, if not faster than my smashes with my BS10. That's saying a lot! (for me anyways) The stiff shaft on the BS10 with a fast swing delivers DEADLY smashes, yet the XP-70 was able to do the same!

    The XP-70 is also an easy racket to use, I can play with minimal effort, and also smash continually. Umm, the net shots and drives were average, so not too much to say (for now). I'm curious about comparing this racket to the MX JJS and the Z-speed since they have similar specs but I don't think I'll be able to try them anytime soon :crying:
     
  15. yerrorice

    yerrorice Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
    Messages:
    101
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Canada
    Update: I played another 2 hours tonight and the XP-70 is NICE, all my shots were going where I wanted them. The sweet spot is a bit smaller than isometric rackets but I'm fine since I used to use oval rackets :p. I finally understand what people mean when they say "Yonex rackets feel damped", I played with my friend's NS9900 again and it felt so dull! In comparison, my BS10 and XP-70 feel SO MUCH livelier.
     
  16. bos_dc2

    bos_dc2 Regular Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2013
    Messages:
    237
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    Just purchased an XP70 from visor!

    Specs 87g / 297mm
    Zm62 @ 22x23

    Can't wait to test it out!
     
  17. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    Hope it works out well for you!

    I just came back from my 2 hr baddy session, and forcing myself to rotate between the APP and JJS, I found myself coming back to the XP70 when the game got tight. Smash, half smash, clear, drive, drop, net, feel, defence ... everything was so much better with the XP70. I don't even know why I bother with looking at or buying other rackets... :p
     
    #297 visor, Nov 15, 2013
    Last edited: Nov 15, 2013
  18. forumer

    forumer Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2007
    Messages:
    64
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    singapore
    Any comparison between XP70 and Victor TK6000?
     
  19. teoky

    teoky Regular Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    Messages:
    1,543
    Likes Received:
    0
    Occupation:
    Manager
    Location:
    Singapore
    They are different beast. TK6000 is head heavy and more attack oriented whereas XP70 is all rounder.
     
  20. visor

    visor Regular Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2009
    Messages:
    16,402
    Likes Received:
    2,001
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC
    although it would be very interesting to compare a 4u tk6k (likely 84/305) with a 88/300 xp70 :)
     

Share This Page