Any update info on data with string and grip? and more feedbacks assuming you have played with it for a fair bit now xD
In gist, zf2 shaft is much much stiffer. I'll say average user will in general have harder time generating massive power from it. It is also much more HH and tiring to use than TK9900.
Completely agree. HH: ZF2 > TK9900 > TK9000 > TKF => Astrox 77 > TK7000 My thoughts. I just bought one more TKF as it has become my go to racquet in the last few months. I typically use Zymax 66 or 62 Fire strings and have one of the TKF using the Zymax 84. My smash power is slowly increasing now after a few months... the speed to power ratio is incredible here. I use it strictly for doubles. I would stick with my TK9900 for Singles.
Is this racket comparable to Lining n7ii light? Im thinking between this TKF and the N7ii light. A girl would be using it has to be 5U.
Without knowing more about the girl, my advice would be to get the N7II Light. Simply because of the 2 choices it is the much more user friendly racket. However if she's been playing for awhile and has developed decent technique and skill, then the TK F would be a better choice as it would provide far more room to grow and possibly better performance. Sent from my LG-H930 using Tapatalk
actually for a girl even or head light aero 3u frame with flex shaft would make much much more sense, since racket could help generate power, for a 5u extremely powerful fingers and wrist are required, and girl would end up lifting everything to the middle of the court...
Anyone here could provide comparison of either TK9900 or TKF against TK6000? I'm using TK6000 currently, mostly for doubles. Have spent some time researching (including BC) TKF. Would appreciate any personal verdicts you may have.
Can't really reply. I have more experience with the TK9000 and TKF. Not that much with the 9900 and 6000 tbh. Sent from my LG-H930 using Tapatalk
Okay, how would you contrast TKF and TK9000, for doubles? I see Yumo.ca has only 3U for TK9000. Just wonder if that maybe too heavy as I've been using 4U for some time.
I have 6000 7000 9900 and tkf Tkf is fastest 9900 is stiffest but most powerful What r u looking to compare against? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tbh 3U isn't thay heavy. If your technique and strength are there it won't trouble you. But if you use 4U then it would be safer to stick to 4U in general. TKF and TK9000 are both great for doubles. Although the TKF would be the more rounded of the pair. It's stiffer and more even balanced than the TK9000 so it works in every dept on the court. But the TK9000 does edge it out in power so would be abit more suitable to the back of the court. Sent from my LG-H930 using Tapatalk
Sounds like the Thruster series would be where I want to focus, not JS, or HX series. I'd like to play at front, mid or back with equal ease. However, I'd like to borrow some technology to improve/increase the sting behind my smashes.